I could start this post by asking "which one of these is not alike"- the answer is pretty easy.
Brad Trost is the MP for my old riding of Saskatoon-Humboldt, and I think its a crime that this man is still just a backbencher. I've spoken with him a couple of times, and I think he truly has the good of his country and his constituency in his mind whenever he acts. One of the (many) things I like about him is that he is a member of the multi-party Parlimentary Pro-life Caucus. And this post is really about the petition he is sponsoring in the House of Commons. You can view it here.
The petition asks the Government of Canada to stop funding the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF). You see, as of 2006, the taxpayers of Canada agreed to pay IPPF $18 MILLION over 4 years. I'm not going to go into the reasons why the government did this (because I don't know, and anything I say will just be ranting speculation) but they have.
I think Mr. Trost's petition is a great idea, and I encourage you all to print a copy off and get people signing it.
That brings me to the next part of the post- the USSU (or University of Saskatchewan Students Union). I paid money to this organization for 6 years while I was a student and I'm so happy they no longer get a dime of my money. The USSU is, like all Student's Unions I'm aware of, an extreme left wing institution that seems to exist to waste its members money. (I bet you have no idea how I really feel about it.)
Anyway, one of the members of the executive (who is elected by the student body) took offense to Mr. Trost's petition and is circulating a petition of his own. It asks the government to continue funding IPPF.
Now, I have no problem with an individual disagreeing with a politician's stance (I know its often me disagreeing) but I have a real problem with a institution that is funded by members taking such a stance- because the institution should be speaking for its members.
Having attended the U of S, and been involved with the U of S Students for Life, I know there are many USSU members who support Mr. Trost's petition, and not the USSU's. Consequently, I think it is wrong for the USSU to sponsor their petition. If individual members of the USSU or its executive want to have a counter petition- that's fine- that's what a democracy is about. But I think its wrong for them to use the USSU name to do it. Read their press release. It states that the USSU "condemns a petition being circulated by Brad Trost." The USSU should be doing no such thing.
So, for those of you who are U of S students (or alumni) please contact the USSU and tell them what you think of this- in polite, charitable terms.
One final comment is on Mr. Trost's response to the USSU's petition. You can read it here. But the title of the response says it all- "Freedom of Speech is an Absolute Right." Did I mention Mr. Trost was a stand up guy? Almost makes me wonder how he ended up in politics... and explains why he's still a backbencher.
But, if I still lived in that riding, he'd have my vote in the next election.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Dear Sandy,
In light of Mr. Ignatieff wanting to force an absurd connection between support for the poorest people and forcing the governments to at least condone murder of the unborn, I stumpled on your blog entry. Right you are. (The link to the petition did not work for me though.) It is beyond me why the politically correct always assume that they have rights and their opponents don't but that is the way things work in this world today.
All the best in your studies. I hope and trust you will make a difference!
May God bless and guide you.
Armin
Sorry, Sarah,
I do not normally read blogs, therefore I am not well versed with the layouts, etc. I picked up the name Sandy in one of the responses to a comment and thought it was you and therefore addreese the comment above falsely. Iam sorry, please, forgive me.
Post a Comment