First, the Family Issues arm of Catholic Council of Bishops in Peru has written a letter to the CCCB asking them why they (through D&P) are financially supporting the very groups that the Peruvian bishops are fighting against because of their support of abortion. You can read the letter here. The letter is very direct, and formally asks the CCCB to halt funding to the organizations. The letter states:
"It is very disturbing to have groups which work against the Bishops of Peru by attempting to undermine legal protection for the right to life of unborn children, be funded by our brother bishops in Canada"I don't know how more direct the bishops can be. This is no longer a case of "some internet groups rabblerousing" as some bishops in Canada have suggested. There is a direct call by another council of Bishops asking the CCCB to halt the funding. I hope that this letter is the wake up call the CCCB needs.
Unfortunately, I don't think it is. The second development I want to share with you is the news that the investigation conducted by the CCCB into 5 of D&P's Mexican partners found absolutely no evidence of abortion or abortion related activity. Archbishop Weisberger of Winnipeg (the head of the CCCB) in an interview with Salt and Light Television stated:
"But I can assure you that in the report, the bishops found very clearly that there was no evidence that Development and Peace in any way funded abortion-related activities."He also (in my opinion) questioned the credibility of LSN for making the allegations. He essentially said that we now have a choice- to believe LSN or to believe the Bishops:
"It seems that there is a tendency on the part of some people to trust allegations on websites more than they trust the bishops. That’s the role of the bishops in the Church and when the bishops investigate something, when the bishops look at things and when the bishops teach, according to our theology, we should have confidence in that."You can read the transcript of the interview here.
I don't like Archbishop Weisberger telling me that I have to accept what the CCCB says because they are the ones with the authority on moral teachings. As anyone who has been reading this blog for awhile knows, I am a very ardent supporter of the Church and her Bishops and I believe strongly in the authority of the Magisterium. However, I think Archbishop Weisberger is being disingenuous by claiming that now that the investigation is done, we just have to trust what the Bishops have said.
We have yet to actually read the report done by the CCCB. I want to know exactly what was said by whom, and who the CCCB talked to, and how involved D&P was in the investigation itself. I believe the bishops can run a thorough investigation, but this was not one- the set up of the committee going was heavily loaded with D&P members- that's not unbiased. In law, when picking a jury, potential jurors are screened for biases they can't put aside- that didn't happen here, and it should have.
Also, the Bishops have yet to address the other 14 allegations made, and based on the transcript of the Salt and Light interview, I don't think they are going to. Maybe I am splitting hairs, but if the investigation into all the allegations is not done, how can the bishops speak authoritatively on it?
There is something rotten in the D&P organization. The proof Lifesite has offered is, in my opinion, very strong, and the CCCB has ignored it.
Lifesite has summarized the allegations and following events into a short 5 minute video- I suggest you all watch it, and ask you to pass it along to your friends.
And please, write your bishops again and ask them to do three things- 1) release the D&P report 2) investigate the other allegations 3) respond publicly to the Peruvian Bishops letter. Of course, be respectful, but make sure they understand that you are concerned about being complicit in the deaths of unborn children.
4 comments:
One Peruvian bishop, on his own, wrote to Canada. One. So many reports suggest it was the Peruvian Bishops plural. It is mistakes like this that allow for Lifesite to be labelled un-credible.
Hello Sarah,
I was wondering if you could update your "legal analysis" that you posted on March 20th in light of the new evidence that has emerged over the past few weeks.
http://catholiclawstudent.blogspot.com/2009/03/development-and-peace-responds.html
In response to the first comment:
The Peruvian bishop that wrote the letter is the president of their Family, Childhood and Life Commission.
As such, he has delegated authority from the other bishops to speak on their behalf with regards to issues under his jurisdiction. It is no coincidence that he wrote his letter on paper with the letterhead of the Conference of Bishops of Peru.
To Anon (at 8:20 am)
As Steve said, it was the President of their Family Commission who wrote- as the President of that commission, while speaking on matters pertaining to it, he has the authority to speak on behalf of the other bishops.
When speaking in an authoritative position, it is indeed the bishops plural who are speaking. The formal letterhead of the Peruvian Bishops is evidence of that.
To Anon (at 9:01 am)
I have done as you asked in the post found here.
I wasn't sure exactly what evidence you meant, so if I've forgotten an important piece, please let me know.
Post a Comment